01 · Discipline
Sector / fagretning
Children’s, Adult Care, Health, Youth Justice, Witness, HR, or Legal Advocacy. This chooses the role cascade, process stages, and allow-listed knowledge pack. Depth is graded on purpose.
Platform qualities
Same engine. Graded depth. Honest labels.
The Statutory Conversation Simulator shares the same practice qualities across trainers — AI-generated cases, sector-scoped knowledge, scored reflection, GDPR controls. What changes is which law and corpus sit underneath: by sector, by country, and — for universities — by placement focus, not by inventing a separate statute per campus.
Three axes
How to read differences
KallosSim is one product with many entry points. When something feels “different”, it is almost always one of these three axes — not a different product.
02 · Place
Country / jurisdiction
UK, US (state + county), Canada, Australia, Ireland. This chooses which statute and process labels appear. Selectable place ≠ a fully curated manual for every council or county.
03 · Setting
Organisation type
Local authority, agency, or university. This changes who you practise with, invites, and optional placement / curriculum overlays — not which national statute pack you get.
Selectable ≠ knowledge depth. You can pick a supported jurisdiction or sector today. We do not promise a unique, fully curated statutory manual for every local authority, US county, or university module catalogue. Labels in-app (founding, dedicated, early access) tell you how deep the verified corpus is.
Glossary
What the abbreviations mean
These qualities apply across trainers. Hover a row to focus it. Citation strength still follows the sector and market pack behind the scenes.
AI-generated cases
Stands for: artificial intelligence generation of scenarios and personas.
Every case is created fresh from your card selections. There is no static production library of canned scripts. Same engine everywhere; the prompts and knowledge filters change with sector and market.
Sector-scoped knowledge (RAG)
Stands for: retrieval-augmented generation — pulling only from allow-listed sources for that sector and market.
An HR session does not retrieve children’s safeguarding law. Pack size differs: Children’s and HR are deepest today; other packs are thinner and labelled early access.
Formative reflection
Stands for: scored formative debrief after practice — not a pass/fail exam.
Citations appear when RAG retrieves them. Strongest today for Children’s (Working Together / Children Act) and HR (ACAS). Other sectors cite what their packs hold. Starting points for learning, not competence assessment.
Voice + text practice
Stands for: voice and text rehearsal channels.
Same quotas and product rules across sectors. Free includes 20 text and 3 voice sessions; paid plans unlock unlimited text and monthly voice quotas.
Card cascade A–J
Stands for: ten configuration cards that shape the case.
A role · B process stage · C complexity · D target group · E diversity dimension · F conversation type · G emotional state · H relationship · I training focus · J maturity (young-person targets). Which options appear depends on sector and market — for example US children’s process stages differ from UK.
CPD-ready export
Stands for: continuing professional development evidence export.
Export a practice journal with scores and citations for supervision portfolios. Designed for UK GDPR Art. 20 data portability. Formative evidence — not a submission pack to a regulator.
Org admin & quality
Stands for: organisation administration and aggregated quality views.
Team leads invite members, see completion and score trends, and manage settings — always scoped to their organisation. Works for councils, agencies, and universities the same way; curriculum overlays are an extra layer for academia orgs only.
GDPR built-in
Stands for: UK GDPR / data-protection controls in the product.
Export your data, delete training history, delete your account, and contact your organisation’s DPO from the app — not a bolted-on form.
Training only
Stands for: safe rehearsal boundary.
Fictional cases only. Not decision support for live casework, not legal advice, and not a substitute for supervision — in any country or sector.
Responsible AI
Stands for: responsible AI practices.
Anti-stereotyping guardrails, zero-data-retention on model APIs, and public transparency on how practice conversations are handled. Details: AI transparency and ethics.
By sector
Sectors — graded knowledge depth
Seven trainers share the qualities above. The corpus behind generation and citation is not identical. That is intentional honesty, not a bug.
| Sector | Depth label | Primary framework focus | What that means in practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Children’s Services | Founding | Working Together 2026 · Children Act | Deepest curated RAG and citation trail. UK founding product. |
| HR & Employment | Dedicated | ACAS Code · employment themes | Separate HR app shell; dedicated ACAS-oriented pack. Formative, not CIPD assessment. |
| Adult Social Care | Early access | Care Act · MCA themes | Live trainer; thinner corpus than Children’s. Verify local guidance alongside practice. |
| Health | Early access | NHS safeguarding themes | Useful rehearsal now; not a full NICE / NHS knowledge product yet. |
| Youth Justice | Early access | YOT practice themes | Formative AssetPlus-style / restorative practice while the pack grows. |
| Witness Intermediary | Early access | YJCEA · ABE themes | Distinct from children’s social care; thinner formative pack. |
| Legal Advocacy | Content-ready | CPR / CrimPR / FPR · US moot framing | Formative courtroom practice only — not BSB, SRA, or ABA assessment. |
By country
Jurisdictions — what changes across borders
Language can be English in several markets. Law is not. Market URL (and US county choice) selects the statutory pack and process labels.
United Kingdom
National England-wide children’s pack by design (Working Together, Children Act). No per–local-authority RAG for all ~150 councils — statutory conversation practice uses the shared national framework. Optional named LA partner overlays are curated with that council, not a general product promise.
Say: “National Working Together framework.” Avoid: implying every LA’s bespoke CP manual is loaded.
United States
Children’s v1 is county-scoped: federal baseline + state law + practice archetype + county name in the case. California is the deepest live state path; TX / NY / FL are beta. Selecting a county does not mean a unique full manual for all 3,234 counties.
Say: “Calibrated to your county and state practice archetype.” Avoid: “exact county statute for every US county.”
Canada · Australia · Ireland
Children’s market entry points with national or provincial/state framing. Live as early-access pilots — useful for localised rehearsal, with thinner curated depth than UK Children’s founding corpus.
- Canada — provincial child-welfare framing
- Australia — state/territory child-protection framing
- Ireland — Children First / Tusla themes
What never changes by country
- AI / voice-text / GDPR / training-only boundaries
- No real case data in prompts
- Org isolation — your organisation does not change the statute pack; the market URL (and US county) does
Universities & placement
Academia is a setting — not a new legal system
Many fagretninger train inside universities (social work, MSW, law clinics, PE-led cohorts). KallosSim can reflect placement conversation types and programme hints. It does not replace the university VLE, nor invent campus-specific policy as statute.
What universities get
- Same sector trainers and market packs as practitioners
- Org admin for Practice Educators / team leads — invites, cohort views
- Optional academia placement training pack — modules that mirror common placement conversation types
- Optional curriculum overlays: programme-aligned hints into case generation from an editorial institution catalog — not live feeds from each university’s module specs
What universities do not get (Phase 1 honesty)
- A separate statute pack per university
- Validated mapping to credit-bearing assessment criteria
- LTI / Moodle / PebblePad / Sonia integration
- A formal Practice Assessor workflow or regulator submission pack
Rule of thumb: university setting changes who practises together and optional placement focus — the law still follows sector + country.
Example: a UK PE cohort on Children’s still practises against Working Together. A US MSW placement still follows the selected state/county children’s path. The “university difference” is placement framing and org tooling — not a third legal axis.
Honest limits
What we will not over-claim
Platform qualities are shared. Depth is graded. If a pack is early access, the product says so — in marketing and in-app.
We do
- Label founding / dedicated / early access clearly
- Scope RAG so sectors do not cross-contaminate law
- Let users select supported jurisdictions for localised rehearsal
- Keep fictional cases only — every market
We do not
- Promise Children’s-level corpus parity in every sector
- Promise a curated manual for every LA, county, or campus
- Treat formative scores as competence or Bar / SRA / ABA assessment
- Use real case data — ever